Category Archives: Disc prolapse

Musculosceletal disorders

Early MRI in back pain inappropriate

Choosing to send back pain sufferers for MRI examination may cause problems. Of a group of 400.000 with low back pain 10.000 had an early MRI. “Early” is within 6 weeks.
The results of this? Likelihood of operation was 13 times higher in the year after, they were more likely to be treated with opioid drugs and final pain scores were worse. The cost of this was also significantly higher. It therefore seems wise to follow the rules…
From Journal Watch feb 2021

Low back and radicular pain: is treatment futile?

“New guidelines, several meta-analyses and a few new studies show that neither medication nor nonpharmacologic approaches confer much benefit” (JWatch.org jan 2018)

A few studies have been done on Gabapentin and Pregabalin for back pain with radicular pain and not been found to have any effect. One study with Pregabalin titrated to 600mg and continued for 8 weeks was ineffective. It had the same effect as “sugar” pills.

Six studies of gabapentin versus placebo or pregabalin against another analgesic in pat. with LBP (about 500 pat) showed no clinically meaningful benefits and substantial side effects.

Diazepam as extra medication in 114 pat. w LBP who were given naproxen did not improve pain or function at 1 week.

NSAIDS (ex. naproxen, ibuprofen) have also been in the storm of questioning their effect and shown to have only modest effect in LBP w/wo radicular pain. One would need to treat 6 patients for 1 to have benefit.

Nonpharmacological treatments:
1. intradiscal steroids in pat. w MRI evidence of vertebral endplate inflammation: after 1 mo some improvement, after 3 mo worse, after 12 mo no difference.
2. Radiofrequency denervation for pat. w pain from facet joints, SI joints or intervert discs showed no incremental benefit when added to typical exercise therapy.
3. Spinal manipulation a meta analysis of 26 randomised trials for acute LBP showed statistically significant but modest benefit að 6 weeks with a high frequency of moderate side effects.

So: drugs dont work, injections and denervations dont work, manipulation seems to help a little bit but you pay a considerable sum of money and waste time doing repeated manipulations.

It may be considered a relief that you dont need to take any medication, you dont need to go to the doctor, physiotherapist or chiropractor, you just wait for a few weeks knowing that there is sound reason to expect spontaneous recovery.
If the back pain is chronic, which indeed is a very common condition; medication with pain medication is not advisable as the risk of addiction is considerable and the effect is small according to research.

Note: these are not to be considered guidelines for every back pain situation!

Steroids for acute disc prolaps

Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted from 2008 to 2013 in a large integrated health care delivery system in Northern California. Adults (n=269) with radicular pain for 3 months or less, an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 30 or higher (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate greater dysfunction), and a herniated disk confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were eligible.

results: Pain did not change significantly, working ability was slightly better. Hardly benefit in giving steroids orally for acute disc prolaps.